W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: ACTION-280 completed

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:04:08 +0000
Message-Id: <769EF106-50A1-4233-9720-21BB42334981@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-wg Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>

On 5 Feb 2009, at 13:28, Ivan Herman wrote:

> Hi Bijan,
> Somewhere down the lines you say:
> [[[
> Accordingly, the working group has decided not to make the change  
> you've
> suggested.
> ]]]
> My feeling of yesterday's meeting was that we did not really  
> understood
> what Frank is saying

I feel 100% that I understand it :)  We can discuss it further, but  
there's no doubt in my mind./

> (although it is 90% sure that he really
> misunderstood). Didn't we say that we would ask him whether this
> explanation is an answer to his issue or whether he was thinking of
> something else?

That's always an option, but is it really necessary? It seems clear  
enough to me. If the working group doesn't agree with my  
interpretation or certainty, then I guess we'll reject my proposed  
text and draft another.

I can send a note to Frank off list asking if my proposed response is  
on target (even if he doesn't agree with the response), I suppose.

> Just my 2 cents... (sorry, 2 pence, you are in the UK and 2 pence  
> still
> has a _slightly_ higher value than 2 cents:-)

Thanks for reading it and giving feedback. My suggestion is that you  
reread the comment and response. If you aren't sufficiently  
convinced, then we can ask Frank if we're in the right space.

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 14:01:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:09 UTC