W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2009

Re: CR comments

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:31:27 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
cc: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <23908.1249396287@waldron>

> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/JH1
> > 
> > The tone of JH1 seems unnecessarily hostile.  Please at least drop the
> > paragraph beginning, "Comments during the CR phase..."
>
> Isn't there some W3C document that states that comments during CR are
> supposed to be about implementation, not design?  I seem to remember
> reading this, but now I can't find the document.

There may be something in that direction, but it certainly does not
entitle us to ignore comments on the design:

     Starting with a Last Call review up to the transition to Proposed
     Recommendation, a Working Group MUST formally address any
     substantive review comment about a technical report and SHOULD do
     so in a timely manner.
            -- http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html

(As a logician, do you find that use of "any" to be a little odd?
Should it be rephrased in the plural, with "all"?  Anyway, the intent is
clear.)

     -- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:31:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:31:48 GMT