W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2009

Re: CR comments

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:29:06 -0400
Message-ID: <20090804.102906.34706873.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: <sandro@w3.org>, <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: CR comments 
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:32:24 -0500

> On 4 Aug 2009, at 15:21, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
>> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: CR comments
>> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:09:52 -0500
>>
>>>
>>>> I have drafted responses to the comments from Gioele Barabucci[1]  
>>>> and
>>>> Jeff Heflin [2].
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you are (un)happy with these responses.
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/GB1
>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/JH1
>>>
>>> The tone of JH1 seems unnecessarily hostile.  Please at least drop  
>>> the
>>> paragraph beginning, "Comments during the CR phase..."
>>>
>>>      -- Sandro
>>
>> Isn't there some W3C document that states that comments during CR are
>> supposed to be about implementation, not design?  I seem to remember
>> reading this, but now I can't find the document.
> 
> Since we have reasonable answers to everything, why bother making  
> this point to Jeff?
> 
> Several of his points are somewhat editorial. Let's be grateful for  
> the generally positive tone of his comment. If he wants to press  
> something (i.e., he thinks it should go back to last call) that would  
> be a different issue.
> 
> Lots of people make comments at inopportune times. I believe Sandro's  
> point is that there's no point in possibly getting his back up on a  
> procedural point we don't even need!
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.

True.

peter
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:29:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:29:38 GMT