W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Freezing documents for publication

From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:53:11 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670904171153t2a4a4fbev33350987c0b1ee6a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Christine

Thanks. Please let me know when you finished and I will update QRG to
the new links

Jie

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jie, Sandro,
>
> Jie, I am being fixing them for you for NF&R and I have nearly finished:
> only still missing asymmetric,  reflexive, irreflexive,
> those ones where removed in the strong slimming treatment of NF&R,
> I may restore the subsections in NF&R or you may change the ling to
> the upper section.
>
> Christine
>
> 2009/4/17 Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>:
>> I will fix QRG today
>>
>> Jie
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm aware that there have been several last minute reviews and that
>>>> document editors have been responding to these by continuing to
>>>> update the documents in the wiki. I'm very grateful for the effort
>>>> that has gone into this and the resulting improvement in the quality
>>>> of the spec. However, we now need to stop changing the documents so
>>>> that we can complete a final validation and link check and create the
>>>> HTML snapshots. Can editors therefore please conclude any in-progress
>>>> editorial work *now* and refrain from making any more changes until
>>>> further notice -- other than those needed to fix structural problems
>>>> identified by the above mentioned validation and link checks.
>>>
>>> There are new preview snapshots linked from here:
>>>
>>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-overview-20090416/
>>>
>>> and copies of me running checklinks on them here:
>>>
>>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks
>>>
>>> Everything looks fine to me except:
>>>
>>>   NFR is reported as having some broken links, but this must be
>>>   due to a bug in the checker, since the links seem fine to me
>>>
>>>   QRG has about 20 broken links to Primer and NFR.  Running the
>>>   checker on the wiki page erroneously reports about 100 broken
>>>   links, but I think these ones really are broken:
>>>
>>>     http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks/checklinks-110-owl2-quick-reference.html
>>>
>>> I'm supposed to give finished copies to the Webmaster on Sunday, so
>>> hopefully someone can fix QRG (either by editing it, or by editing
>>> Primer and NFR to add the right destinations).
>>>
>>>     -- Sandro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jie Bao
>> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
>>
>> Facebook,Twitter,Skype,Msn,LinkedIn - check url above
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christine
>



-- 
Jie Bao
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie

Facebook,Twitter,Skype,Msn,LinkedIn - check url above
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 18:53:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 April 2009 18:53:52 GMT