W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Freezing documents for publication

From: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:49:42 +0200
Message-ID: <b0ed1d660904171149v239bd44au84e798a42e86610c@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jie, Sandro,

Jie, I am being fixing them for you for NF&R and I have nearly finished:
only still missing asymmetric,  reflexive, irreflexive,
those ones where removed in the strong slimming treatment of NF&R,
I may restore the subsections in NF&R or you may change the ling to
the upper section.

Christine

2009/4/17 Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>:
> I will fix QRG today
>
> Jie
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm aware that there have been several last minute reviews and that
>>> document editors have been responding to these by continuing to
>>> update the documents in the wiki. I'm very grateful for the effort
>>> that has gone into this and the resulting improvement in the quality
>>> of the spec. However, we now need to stop changing the documents so
>>> that we can complete a final validation and link check and create the
>>> HTML snapshots. Can editors therefore please conclude any in-progress
>>> editorial work *now* and refrain from making any more changes until
>>> further notice -- other than those needed to fix structural problems
>>> identified by the above mentioned validation and link checks.
>>
>> There are new preview snapshots linked from here:
>>
>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-overview-20090416/
>>
>> and copies of me running checklinks on them here:
>>
>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks
>>
>> Everything looks fine to me except:
>>
>>   NFR is reported as having some broken links, but this must be
>>   due to a bug in the checker, since the links seem fine to me
>>
>>   QRG has about 20 broken links to Primer and NFR.  Running the
>>   checker on the wiki page erroneously reports about 100 broken
>>   links, but I think these ones really are broken:
>>
>>     http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks/checklinks-110-owl2-quick-reference.html
>>
>> I'm supposed to give finished copies to the Webmaster on Sunday, so
>> hopefully someone can fix QRG (either by editing it, or by editing
>> Primer and NFR to add the right destinations).
>>
>>     -- Sandro
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jie Bao
> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
>
> Facebook,Twitter,Skype,Msn,LinkedIn - check url above
>
>



-- 
Christine
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 18:50:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 April 2009 18:50:22 GMT