W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 -- where should they be documented?

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:52:26 +0100
Message-Id: <E374CC08-89AB-4D18-B5F5-3686F5D36BAC@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
We didn't manage to conclude this discussion.

Summary of the discussion so far:

* Differences between OWL 2 and OWL 2 occur and/or are discussed in  
(at least) Overview, NF&R and Primer
* Some believe that duplication should be avoided if possible
* Some believe that the description/discussion should be very brief
* Distinguishing new features from changed features may be important  
-- the latter will need careful explanation, rationalisation and test  
cases
* Most seemed to believe that NF&R was the right place to document  
new features, with possible brief recap in Overview(?)
* Still not clear where *changed features* should be documented.

Comments?

Ian
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 18:53:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 April 2009 18:53:15 GMT