Hello, Oops, that's a big omission -- sorry! I've just fixed it, and here is the diff: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Syntax&diff=13356&oldid=13230 Uli and Ian, could you please go again over the restrictions and make sure that I haven't overlooked anything else? Regards, Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evren Sirin > Sent: 24 September 2008 15:30 > To: Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG > Subject: Restrictions on property chains > > > I'm comparing the restrictions defined in the syntax document > regarding property chains [1] and the conditions defined in the SROIQ > paper [2]. I'm having problems verifying they enforce actually the > same conditions. > > In [2], it is said that there should be a regular order on the set of > properties which is defined to be a strict partial order with the > additional restriction that > > S < R iff INV(S) < R > > In [1], the strict partial order requirement is there but I don't see > anything that would enforce this additional constraint. As a result, > an axiom like > > SubPropertyOf( PropertyChain( P P ) InverseOf( P ) ) > > is disallowed by [2] but allowed by [1]. > > Is this difference in the definitions because regularity was more > strict than necessary? Or is this a bug in [2]? > > Regards, > Evren > > PS: A very minor issue is that the citation [3] is for [2] but link > points to the technical report [4]. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#The_Restrictions_on_the_Axiom_Closure > [2] http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~sattler/publications/KR-06-SROIQ.pdf > [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#ref-sroiq > [4] http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~sattler/publications/sroiq-TR.pdfReceived on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:55:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:55:39 GMT