I have a few general comments on the way the card is going. 1/ This is turning out not to be a reference card, but is instead very much a quick guide to the OWL 2 RDF vocabulary. There are multiple places that should be changed to reflect this, including the "title". 2/ There are quite a few errors in the card. I'm not going to list them here, awaiting a more-complete version. 3/ The organization of the vocabulary is strange in some places, particularly its assignment of owl:AllDifferent (and a few other names) to "Special classes" when they instead should be something like owl:NegativePropertyAssertion. peterReceived on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:07:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:07:15 GMT