W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:45:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20080922.194529.224758205.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

I don't know what you are asking for here.  

It is true that annotations interfere with the flow, and thus make
ontology dumps hard to read, but what else can be done?

I will change the "user-friendly" bit to talk explicitly about
descriptions.

peter


From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:00:54 -0400

> Hello Peter,
> 
> Is there a way to have comments (not rdfs:comments) in the Manchester syntax?
> 
> "The Manchester syntax is a user-friendly compact syntax for OWL 2"
> 
> Here is a piece of output from an OWL ontology I am working with.
> Absent the labels, it isn't very user friendly. Perhaps we can have
> the printout use both labels and identifiers, or even labels alone,
> providing they are unique.
> 
> -Alan
> 
> Class: obo:artifact
>     Annotations:
>         obo:IAO_0000116 "There is not yet consensus this term",
>         obo:IAO_0000114 obo:IAO_0000124,
>         obo:IAO_0000115 "An artifact is an independent continuant that
> is the intended output of an objective driven process"
>     SubClassOf:
>         snap:IndependentContinuant
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> >
> > In fulfillment of ACTION-205 [1], the ready-for-review version of the
> > Manchester Syntax document [2] is ready for review.
> >
> > peter
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/actions/205
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ManchesterSyntax
Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 23:46:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 23:46:10 GMT