W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

RE: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 9--15

From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:40:05 +0100
To: "'Mike Smith'" <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
Cc: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <887D15D018D246829BBAE4A816EAA8B8@wolf>

Done! Here are the diffs:

Syntax:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Syntax&diff=13230&oldid=13226

Semantics:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Semantics&diff=13233&oldid=13227

RDF Mapping:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=13234&oldid=13229

Profiles:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Profiles&diff=13235&oldid=13223

XML Syntax:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=OWL_XML_Schema&diff=13236&oldid=12446

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Smith [mailto:msmith@clarkparsia.com]
> Sent: 19 September 2008 14:25
> To: Boris Motik
> Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 9--15
> 
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Boris Motik
> <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > @Mike, Section 9.4: I don't recall a particular motivation for the properties arguments preceding
> the class expression. If there is
> > no specific motivation, I suggest modifying this so that the class expression is first. This would
> match the RDF syntax and make
> > things a little easier for users. (A change from KeyFor to HasKey or something similar would
> probably go along with a reorder).
> >
> > I've followed Bijan's design here, which, I believe, has followed the usual DL syntax. The common
> reading is "Such-and-such
> > properties are the key for such-and-such class". I personally don't really care about the actual
> syntax. I haven't, however, changed
> > the spec yet: can you please coordinate with Bijan and perhaps the other interested parties?
> 
> Bijan and Uli do not object to the change, and Evren, who raised the
> issue with me during his RDF document review, supports it.  So, not
> hearing objections from others I think we should change from KeyFor to
> HasKey and change the argument order so that all serializations (FS,
> RDF, XML) align.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Mike Smith
> 
> Clark & Parsia
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 13:41:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC