RE: better titles for the two Semantics documents?

Hello,

This seems like a reasonable suggestion: this is exactly what we had in OWL 1.

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jie Bao
> Sent: 16 September 2008 02:12
> To: Sandro Hawke
> Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: better titles for the two Semantics documents?
> 
> 
> How about be consistent with OWL 1? i.e.,
> 
> * Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics
> * RDF-Compatible Model-Theoretic Semantics
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/
> 
> Jie
> 
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > I was talking with Ian and Alan about the upcoming publications, and I
> > see the list of documents looks something like this:
> >
> >   1. Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
> > => 2. Model-Theoretic Semantics
> > => 3. RDF-Based Semantics
> >   4. Mapping to RDF Graphs
> >   5. XML Serialization
> >   6. Profiles
> > [  7. Primer -- not being published in this round ]
> > [  8. Conformance and Test Cases  -- unknown pub plans ]
> >
> > Michael pointed out earlier that the RDF-Based Semantics (#3 above) also
> > use model theory, so the name of the second document is somewhat
> > confusing!  Does anyone have any better ideas?  Talking with Ian and
> > Alan, some of the ideas were:
> >      DL Semantics
> >      First Order Semantics
> >      Primary Semantics
> >      Base Semantics
> > or renaming them both, so it's
> >      Semantics of OWL DL, EL, and QL
> >      Semantics of OWL Full and RL
> >
> > I don't love any of these.  Does anyone have any better ideas?  What
> > is it about http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Semantics that
> > distinguishes it from
> > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/RDF-Based_Semantics (in a way that
> > wont bother or mislead anyone)...?
> >
> >    -- Sandro
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Jie
> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie