W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: better titles for the two Semantics documents?

From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:11:46 -0400
Message-ID: <b6b357670809151811ke2a9f63je0efdee8ece677ca@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

How about be consistent with OWL 1? i.e.,

* Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics
* RDF-Compatible Model-Theoretic Semantics

http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/

Jie

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>
> I was talking with Ian and Alan about the upcoming publications, and I
> see the list of documents looks something like this:
>
>   1. Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
> => 2. Model-Theoretic Semantics
> => 3. RDF-Based Semantics
>   4. Mapping to RDF Graphs
>   5. XML Serialization
>   6. Profiles
> [  7. Primer -- not being published in this round ]
> [  8. Conformance and Test Cases  -- unknown pub plans ]
>
> Michael pointed out earlier that the RDF-Based Semantics (#3 above) also
> use model theory, so the name of the second document is somewhat
> confusing!  Does anyone have any better ideas?  Talking with Ian and
> Alan, some of the ideas were:
>      DL Semantics
>      First Order Semantics
>      Primary Semantics
>      Base Semantics
> or renaming them both, so it's
>      Semantics of OWL DL, EL, and QL
>      Semantics of OWL Full and RL
>
> I don't love any of these.  Does anyone have any better ideas?  What
> is it about http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Semantics that
> distinguishes it from
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/RDF-Based_Semantics (in a way that
> wont bother or mislead anyone)...?
>
>    -- Sandro
>
>



-- 
Jie
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 01:12:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 16 September 2008 01:12:24 GMT