- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:43:58 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 28 okt 2008, at 09:06, Ivan Herman wrote: > What about '.owlx'? > > maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf' and > 'owlm' for the other two. > > Ivan Although certainly prettier, I think it would create problems on FAT- based file systems that (still) use the 8.3 naming scheme as these may truncate a long extension to three characters. -Rinke >> Do we actually need to have a MAC file type? >> >> >> peter >> > > -- > > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf ----------------------------------------------- Drs. Rinke Hoekstra Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands -----------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 08:44:36 UTC