Hm. Shoot. Bugger... :-( So .owx might be the right extension Ivan Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > On 28 okt 2008, at 09:06, Ivan Herman wrote: >> What about '.owlx'? >> >> maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf' and >> 'owlm' for the other two. >> >> Ivan > > Although certainly prettier, I think it would create problems on > FAT-based file systems that (still) use the 8.3 naming scheme as these > may truncate a long extension to three characters. > > -Rinke > >>> Do we actually need to have a MAC file type? >>> >>> >>> peter >>> >> >> -- >> >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > ----------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ----------------------------------------------- > > > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 October 2008 10:18:29 GMT