Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)

Hm. Shoot. Bugger... :-(

So .owx might be the right extension

Ivan

Rinke Hoekstra wrote:
> On 28 okt 2008, at 09:06, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> What about '.owlx'?
>>
>> maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf' and
>> 'owlm' for the other two.
>>
>> Ivan
> 
> Although certainly prettier, I think it would create problems on
> FAT-based file systems that (still) use the 8.3 naming scheme as these
> may truncate a long extension to three characters.
> 
> -Rinke
> 
>>> Do we actually need to have a MAC file type?
>>>
>>>
>>> peter
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> -----------------------------------------------
> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra
> 
> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl    Skype:  rinkehoekstra
> Phone: +31-20-5253499     Fax:   +31-20-5253495
> Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke
> 
> Leibniz Center for Law,          Faculty of Law
> University of Amsterdam,            PO Box 1030
> 1000 BA  Amsterdam,             The Netherlands
> -----------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf