W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2008

relative uri references

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:04:47 -0500
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0811232204j37a6472frb9f47f4098e620f7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Do we not  have to say how these are resolved in the functional and
manchester syntax, and might it not be best to explicitly say so for all
syntaxes?
-Alan

Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 06:05:22 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ivan Herman: "Re: The specification has been updated"
Previous message: Michael Schneider: "RDF-Based Semantics: "Feature Freeze" for publication as 2nd WD"
Next in thread: Boris Motik: "RE: relative uri references"
Reply: Boris Motik: "RE: relative uri references"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 24 November 2008 06:05:24 GMT