- From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:17:15 -0500
- To: "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I can see people may type ow111 or owlll. Will owl-11 be better? Jie On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > > ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ > > Raised by: Jeremy Carroll > On product: > > > An HP reviewer suggests that it causes practical difficulty to have new properties and classes in a new namespace, and sees no real loss in adding the new stuff to the old namespace. > > He also notes that owl11 as a prefix is an invitation to typos. > > > > > > -- Jie Bao Tetherless World Constellation Department of Computer Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY 12180 baojie@cs.rpi.edu http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie/
Received on Saturday, 29 March 2008 16:17:50 UTC