W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice

From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:17:15 -0500
Message-ID: <b6b357670803290917o5ea78bdy112c0ec209ddde08@mail.gmail.com>
To: "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

I can see people may type ow111 or owlll. Will owl-11 be better?

Jie

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
>  ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
>
>  Raised by: Jeremy Carroll
>  On product:
>
>
>  An HP reviewer suggests that it causes practical difficulty to have new properties and classes in a new namespace, and sees no real loss in adding the new stuff to the old namespace.
>
>  He also notes that owl11 as a prefix is an invitation to typos.
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Jie Bao
Tetherless World Constellation
Department of Computer Science
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Troy, NY 12180
baojie@cs.rpi.edu
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie/
Received on Saturday, 29 March 2008 16:17:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 29 March 2008 16:17:53 GMT