ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ Raised by: Jeremy Carroll On product: An HP reviewer suggests that it causes practical difficulty to have new properties and classes in a new namespace, and sees no real loss in adding the new stuff to the old namespace. He also notes that owl11 as a prefix is an invitation to typos.Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 15:38:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 28 March 2008 15:38:57 GMT