W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: abstracts

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:57:21 +0000
Message-Id: <F52A940C-252E-4FD7-9831-588BB73ABBF2@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>

Good suggestion. I asked Boris to at least set up this basic  
structure, and I think that he has now done so. We can of course  
discuss how "well thought out" the sentences are :-)


On 26 Mar 2008, at 15:23, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Right now, it looks like the abstracts all start with the same text  
> and
> then have a custom sentence or two.  As a reader, I find that awkward
> (doing the diff in my head), and I think it short-changes the
> differences between the documents.
> Let's have each abstract be two paragraphs, where the first  
> paragraph is
> shared among all the documents (we can make it a wiki page,
> Shared_Abstract and just template-include it) and the second paragraph
> is custom for that document.   And the second paragraph should be a  
> few
> well-thought-out sentences.   (eg, unlike in XML Serialization  
> where it
> is "This document specifies an XML exchange syntax for OWL 1.1."  :-)
>       -- Sandro
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 18:58:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:03 UTC