W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Review of XML Doc for ACTION-107 (was Oops and review comments)

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:49:37 +0000
Message-Id: <610DA48C-7BFE-49B3-91AD-06521CE24319@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

New subject for the benefit of Tracker...

Begin forwarded message:

> Resent-From: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
> Date: 14 March 2008 14:20:07 GMT
> To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Oops and review comments
>
>
> Oops, I just did some reviewing of the XML Syntax and I think I'm  
> slated for the fragments doc.  Or rather I wanted only one :) But I  
> see I have actions for both. Sigh.
>
> Well, I've done some reviewing of the XML Syntax document. I wanted  
> to remind reviewers that you can inline comments using the review  
> template e.g.,:
>
> 	{{Review|~~~~|I'd make the prior paragraph a temporary editors  
> note. It shouldn't appear in the final spec.}}
>
> (the ~~~~ gets auto expanded with your name and a timestamp, a la:
> 	{{Review|[[User:BijanParsia|BijanParsia]] 08:31, 14 March 2008  
> (EDT)|I'd make the prior paragraph a temporary editors note. It  
> shouldn't appear in the final spec.}}
> )
>
> One thing that would be nice is if I could generate a text file of  
> my review comments (with back pointers) so that I could email them  
> to the list with more "overally" comments....
>
> My overall comment is that it's fine to go. I'd really like the  
> examples removed or the owl11xml prefixes removed (since they make  
> the examples illegible). With the primer there's some question as  
> to whether we should have examples at all. Structuring it a bit  
> more like the RDF Mapping (i.e., terse, with a description of the  
> methodology of the derivation of the schema, then the schema might  
> be enough.) I wouldn't mind a somewhat richer introduction.
>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 11:50:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 March 2008 11:50:22 GMT