W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20080312.153437.262664084.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ACTION-93 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:57:23 -0400

> 
> On Mar 12, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> > In OWL 1.0 every OWL DL ontology can be expressed in the abstract syntax
> > and also as an RDF graph, via the transformation in
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/semantics-all.html#4.1 (which does
> > not depend on a separated vocabulary).  However, such RDF graphs
> 
> What is the referent of "such RDF graphs", please?

"an RDF graph"

> > are not
> > "OWL DL ontologies in RDF graph form" because these must have a
> > separated vocabulary.

peter
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:38:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:38:34 GMT