On Mar 12, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > In OWL 1.0 every OWL DL ontology can be expressed in the abstract > syntax > and also as an RDF graph, via the transformation in > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/semantics-all.html#4.1 (which does > not depend on a separated vocabulary). However, such RDF graphs What is the referent of "such RDF graphs", please? > are not > "OWL DL ontologies in RDF graph form" because these must have a > separated vocabulary. -AlanReceived on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:57:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:57:42 GMT