W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial]

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:38:30 -0500
Message-Id: <BEDA9FD4-AD03-4825-865E-4D4D87F8F0C5@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>

Fine by whatever we decide. I noticed this in my inbox for a couple  
of days with no response, and didn't want to forget it, so put it up  
as an issue. I think it can be closed by Boris directly, being an  
editorial issue and we don't need to process it by the group at all  
at this point.
-Alan

On Mar 7, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
> Process question: while we need to have formal process for dealing  
> with public comment (particularly after last call), this seems a  
> little heavyweight at this stage.
>
> I would have a slight preference for editorial corrections made in  
> response to public comment to simply be done, and reported in one  
> of the routine business items.
>
> OTOH if people are happy to actually use the tracker for these - so  
> be it.
>
> Jeremy
>
> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> Thanks!
>> Ian
>> On 7 Mar 2008, at 10:24, Boris Motik wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've just fixed the spelling, so we can close this issue before  
>>> we even formally open it :-)
>>>
>>>     Boris
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- 
>>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of OWL Working
>>>> Group Issue Tracker
>>>> Sent: 07 March 2008 07:54
>>>> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
>>>> Subject: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial]
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
>>>>
>>>> Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg
>>>> On product:
>>>>
>>>>> From http://www.w3.org/mid/28F10144-F63A-42A3-A560- 
>>>>> BB1712A3F49D@bbn.com
>>>>
>>>>     Resent-From:       public-owl-comments@w3.org
>>>>     From:       mdean@bbn.com
>>>>     Subject:     symetric => symmetric
>>>>     Date:     March 5, 2008 10:19:47 PM EST
>>>>     To:       public-owl-comments@w3.org
>>>>     Archived-At:     <http://www.w3.org/mid/28F10144-F63A-42A3- 
>>>> A560-BB1712A3F49D@bbn.com>
>>>>     Security:     ?Signed
>>>>
>>>> In [1], the productions symetricObjectProperty and  
>>>> asymetricObjectProperty should presumably be
>>>> symmetricObjectProperty and asymmetricObjectProperty throughout  
>>>> (spelling and consistency
>>>> correction).
>>>>
>>>>     Mike
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl11-syntax-20080108/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 18:43:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 March 2008 18:43:23 GMT