ISSUE-100 (rdfall): Should there be valid OWL ontologies that can not be expressed in RDF from OWL Working Group Issue Tracker on 2008-03-07 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from March 2008)

From: OWL Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:09:43 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20080307150943.6513DBF63@nelson.w3.org>

ISSUE-100 (rdfall): Should there be valid OWL ontologies that can not be expressed in RDF

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/

Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg
On product: 

There are apparently some OWL 1.0 ontologies that are not expressible in RDF. This comes as a surprise to some, and I initially thought it a bug. So the working group should resolve whether it is a design principle of OWL that all OWL ontologies can be expressed in RDF, or not.

Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 15:09:55 UTC