W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

RE: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite

From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:25:12 -0000
To: "'Bijan Parsia'" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "'Web Ontology Language \(\(OWL\)\) Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007301c87f85$1feddf80$7212a8c0@wolf>

Hello,

We are aware of the fact that data properties are missing in DL-lite. The reason why we haven't included them yet into the document
is because we wanted to have an opportunity to talk to the Romans and ask them about some technical details. (We thought of doing
this at the DL workshop in May.)

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bijan Parsia
> Sent: 06 March 2008 12:21
> To: Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG
> Subject: Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite
> 
> 
> On 6 Mar 2008, at 11:56, Boris Motik wrote:
> [snip]
> > Now you are right in that we forgot to list the (inverse)functional
> > object properties in the list of the missing features of
> > DL-lite. Thanks for that; I've updated the document. If you find
> > further omissions, please let us know and I'll add them to the
> > appropriate section.
> [snip]
> 
> Aren't DataProperties missing altogether? Is this going to remain?
> 
> 	http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/acceptedLong/submission_23.pdf
> 
> has some work on data values in DL Lite (though with some confusing
> presentation, for me).
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
> 
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 12:26:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 March 2008 12:26:14 GMT