W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > June 2008

proposal to close ISSUE-127 (narynotyet)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:18:58 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20080604.131858.203062722.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial]
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 17:55:35 +0100


> This issue rests on a mistake. The current (minimal) n-ary data
> predicate support is an accepted part of the language. It was part of
> the submission (and was always a part of OWL 1.1) and it was part of
> the first working draft. What we have not decided as a working group
> is whether we will elaborate that (minimal) support or remove it
> altogether. At the moment, given the recent report from HP, I believe
> there is *no* current expressed support in the WG for removing the
> minimal support. Thus, this proposal, unless it expresses a new desire
> on the part of the raiser (in which case it is misphrased), is doubly
> mistaken. 

I agree with Bijan, the member submission included n-ary datatypes (but
not exactly in a finished fashion).  

Given this, I propose that the issue be closed with no change.  I also
do not believe that there is a need to open any new issue related to
datatypes, as ISSUE-5 is still open.

> Cheers,
> Bijan.

Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2008 17:19:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC