Hi Jim! Just two questions for my understanding please: Jim Hendler wrote: >Alan - this seems like a good step forward -My hope, through, >is we'd do something that makes the DLP (extended as you >suggest) be the DL version, and that it would be clear that >the same restricted vocabulary set is a named fragment of OWL >Full (i.e whatever name we assign to this, we would have FragX >DL and FragX Full?) - Do you say by this that the WG should produce a "Full" (i.e RDF compatible) version for /each/ of the proposed tractable DL-fragments, or only for OWLPrime (or what will then be closest to it in the end)? >I believe we made a mistake in the OWL >1.0 group in not having a "OWL F-LITE," and I'd hate to see >that mistake propagated again. By "OWL F-LITE" wrt OWL-1.0: Do you mean an RDF compatible version of OWL-Lite? Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 January 2008 15:29:45 GMT