- From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:49:18 -0000
- To: "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hello, As we've decided on today's telecon, I've fixed this issue. I've extended Section 3 of the RDF mapping document and have added a table with a mapping for the ontology element. Note that only the mapping from RDF to OWL FS was needed; the other one was already there. Here is the diff URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=3135&oldid=3128 Unless nobody objects, I guess we can close the issue at the next telecon. Regards, Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of OWL Working > Group Issue Tracker > Sent: 02 January 2008 18:33 > To: public-owl-wg@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-92 (owl:Ontology to FS mapping): The RDF to FS mapping does not provide a mapping for > the owl:Ontology element to the Functional Style syntax > > > > ISSUE-92 (owl:Ontology to FS mapping): The RDF to FS mapping does not provide a mapping for the > owl:Ontology element to the Functional Style syntax > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ > > Raised by: Rinke Hoekstra > On product: > > > See email discussion at [1] > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0247.html > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 19:50:26 UTC