W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:18:27 +0000
Message-Id: <2B607406-CF7A-4B74-BF1D-EF088FAA5761@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Please find appended the (slightly amended) agenda for this week.


Call in details

If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,  
Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC

     * Date of Call: Wednesday January 23, 2007
     * Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US),  
18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: + (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl  
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc  
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 90 minutes
     * Chair: Alan Ruttenberg
     * Scribe: Scribe List
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 


     * ADMIN (15 min)
           o Roll call
           o Agenda amendments
           o PROPOSED: Accept Minutes of 2008.01.09 teleconference
           o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes
           o Action items status
                 + Pending Review Actions
                 + Overdue Actions
     * Proposals to Resolve Issues (10 mins)
           o PROPOSED: close (as POSTPONED) Issue 8 (dataproperty  
chains) as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/ 
           o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 15 (Ontologies  
should not be required to include a URI) as per http://lists.w3.org/ 
           o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 29 (ser-defined  
Datatypes: owl:DataRange vs rdfs:Datatype) as per http://lists.w3.org/ 
Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0017.html (see also http:// 
lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0147.html and thread)
     * General Discussions (30 min)
           o Punning may be useful for Metamodeling, narrow the gap  
between DL and Full, and/or adversely affect OWL DL/Full  
compatibility. Related issues include Issue 17 (role punning) Issue  
65 (excessive duplication of vocabulary) and Issue 69 (punning is  
incompatible with OWL Full); see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ 
Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0184.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ 
Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0185.html and http://lists.w3.org/ 
Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0186.html for a detailed  
discussion of how typing and typed vocabulary interacts with punning.  
To pun or not to pun (or how much to pun), that is the question!
     * Issues (15 min)
           o Raised Issues
           o Resolved Editorial Issues
                 + Issue 93 RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of  
           o Issue Discussions
                 + Ontology annotations: see Issue 90, Issue 91 and  
Issue 91
     * Additional other business (5 min)

Next Week(s)

     * General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
           o Fragments and Conformance
           o Imports
           o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full  
           o Easy Keys
           o Rich Annotations


     * Martin Dzbor (conference abroad, invited talk) 
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 16:18:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC