W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008

From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:14:25 -0800
Message-ID: <47979211.5070001@sandsoft.com>
To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Belated regrets for this morning due to flaky power (just restored).

Best regards,

Elisa

Ian Horrocks wrote:

>
> Please find appended the (slightly amended) agenda for this week.
>
> Teleconference.2008.01.23/Agenda
>
> Call in details
>
> If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,  
> Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
>
>     * Date of Call: Wednesday January 23, 2007
>     * Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US),  
> 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
>     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
>     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
>     * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
>     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl  
> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
>     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc  
> (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
>     * Duration: 90 minutes
>     * Chair: Alan Ruttenberg
>     * Scribe: Scribe List
>     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 
> 2008.01.23/Agenda
>
> Agenda
>
>     * ADMIN (15 min)
>           o Roll call
>           o Agenda amendments
>           o PROPOSED: Accept Minutes of 2008.01.09 teleconference
>           o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes
>           o Action items status
>                 + Pending Review Actions
>                 + Overdue Actions
>     * Proposals to Resolve Issues (10 mins)
>           o PROPOSED: close (as POSTPONED) Issue 8 (dataproperty  
> chains) as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/ 
> 2008Jan/0122.html
>           o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 15 (Ontologies  should 
> not be required to include a URI) as per http://lists.w3.org/ 
> Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0019.html
>           o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 29 (ser-defined  
> Datatypes: owl:DataRange vs rdfs:Datatype) as per http://lists.w3.org/ 
> Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0017.html (see also http:// 
> lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0147.html and thread)
>     * General Discussions (30 min)
>           o Punning may be useful for Metamodeling, narrow the gap  
> between DL and Full, and/or adversely affect OWL DL/Full  
> compatibility. Related issues include Issue 17 (role punning) Issue  
> 65 (excessive duplication of vocabulary) and Issue 69 (punning is  
> incompatible with OWL Full); see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ 
> Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0184.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ 
> Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0185.html and http://lists.w3.org/ 
> Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0186.html for a detailed  
> discussion of how typing and typed vocabulary interacts with punning.  
> To pun or not to pun (or how much to pun), that is the question!
>     * Issues (15 min)
>           o Raised Issues
>           o Resolved Editorial Issues
>                 + Issue 93 RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of  
> Languages
>           o Issue Discussions
>                 + Ontology annotations: see Issue 90, Issue 91 and  
> Issue 91
>     * Additional other business (5 min)
>
> Next Week(s)
>
>     * General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
>           o Fragments and Conformance
>           o Imports
>           o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full  compatibility)
>           o Easy Keys
>           o Rich Annotations
>
> Regrets
>
>     * Martin Dzbor (conference abroad, invited talk)
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 19:14:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 January 2008 19:14:43 GMT