W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:24:17 +0000
Message-ID: <478F6511.8050306@hpl.hp.com>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> in summary, not in favour of Skolemized semantics; but in favour of 
>> Skolemizing implementations.
> I don't think we have to say anything about implementations, do we? 

If all or most OWL implementations do things in a particular way, it is 
relevant to our decision. We shouldn't be making decisions in isolation 
from implementations (although implementators really get their say 
during the Candidate Rec phase).

Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 14:24:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC