W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Fragments discussion, continued

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:07:32 +0000
Message-ID: <47C2A174.70900@hpl.hp.com>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "'Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Jim Hendler wrote:

> OWL (DL/Full)
> EL ++  //  (and Owl lite)
> OWL For Data  (DL/Full)

That would be quite elegant if it worked!

I think it is worth bearing this in mind, but I wouldn't want to distort 
things too much for it.

I would agree that, as long as the details work out, this would be in 
accord with the sort of desires shown in the straw poll.

Received on Monday, 25 February 2008 11:08:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC