I want to follow up on Wednesday's telecon discussion, and determine how best to operationalise our (very) provisional decisions on fragments. What I believe that we need is a new document that defines the (proposed) rec-track fragments. This document should define the syntax of the "scalable schema" (EL++ like) and "scalable data" (DL- Lite like) fragments, and the syntax and semantics of the "rules" fragment (DLP/OWL-Prime like). My understanding is that for the first two we only need syntax restrictions (the semantics are the same as for OWL 1.1 DL) and in the latter case we need syntax restrictions on the DL side (DLP) and a well defined semantics on the RDF side. Comments? IanReceived on Friday, 22 February 2008 19:41:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 February 2008 19:41:33 GMT