W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: the other DAML+OIL semantics

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:39:49 +0000
Message-Id: <404F2762-4D1C-447A-8F66-AA5E79F2AEE0@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>, <fikes@ksl.stanford.edu>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>

As Boris already pointed out [1], it wouldn't make much sense to  
provide an axiomatic semantics for OWL DL, so we are only really  
talking about OWL Full. Given the close relationship between OWL (in  
particular OWL Full) and RDF, it is not at all surprising that the  
WebOnt WG chose to define the semantics of OWL Full as an extension  
of the RDF semantics.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0015.html
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 16:40:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC