Manchester syntax track from Bijan Parsia on 2008-12-09 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from December 2008)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:35:39 +0000
To: OWL 2 <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <56C83F81-BA39-4EBA-A5D1-302DEB7087E6@cs.man.ac.uk>

Hiya,

Looking at the agenda, I see:
	ManchesterSyntax

But no:
	Proposal: this document will/will-not be rec-track

Do we actually have a decision on this? (Could I have a pointer if we  
have?) Even if so, can we review our reasoning (personally, I can see  
arguments on both sides)?

I've gotten some questions about it, so it'd be good to have a clear  
story.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2008 18:32:38 UTC