- From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:22:50 +1000
- To: "'Evren Sirin'" <evren@clarkparsia.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, "'Carsten Lutz'" <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Hello, I added this into the profile because Carsten at one point made a statement in the WG that this was OK. I don't think, however, that there is a paper (yet) that presents the nuances of how to handle these constructs. Carsten, would you mind commenting on this? Regards, Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evren Sirin > Sent: 13 August 2008 23:47 > To: public-owl-wg@w3.org > Subject: Editorial bug in the EL profile? > > > I believe this is an editorial bug and can be fixed without opening an > issue. The EL++ profile description [1] lists both self-restrictions > (ObjectExistsSelf) and reflexive object properties > (ReflexiveObjectProperty) as part of EL++ profile. However, the cited > paper [2] describes only supporting reflexive properties but not self > restrictions. I'm not aware of any other work describing how to > support self restrictions in EL++ and I believe self restrictions > should be removed from the EL++ profile (or if there is such work that > reference should be included). > > Cheers, > Evren > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Profiles#Feature_Overview > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Profiles#ref-ELppUpd
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2008 14:24:34 UTC