On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:09 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> > Subject: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:43:40 -0400 > >> General Discussion (40 minutes) >> Annotations: Plan B. > > What is Plan B? That is the question. I would like to confer on the status of your and Bijan's work on the annotation proposal, and make plans in the case that it is not ready, as we discussed at the F2F. I anticipate would discuss idea for annotations that fall short of the rich annotation proposal but address some of the requirements our users have articulated. We had postponed that pending seeing what the resolution of rich annotations was. -Alan > If we are going to discuss Annotations yet again, I think that > pointers > to the proposals up for discussion are needed, and that proposals that > have already been discussed should have evolved to be considered for > re-discussion. The only activity I see in the WG related to > annotations > is my message from Monday > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Aug/0060.html > which contains a proposal to close ISSUE-16 by adding annotations on > annotations. > > peterReceived on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:16:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:16:41 GMT