Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG

On 4 Aug 2008, at 17:21, Ian Horrocks wrote:

> Jie,
>
> I would prefer not to add the text about "fuzzy" repair. This seems  
> to me to be at the same time too detailed (we are not blessing any  
> particular kind of repair, and so should say as little as possible  
> about them) and too brief (the proposed repair mechanism isn't  
> really understandable).

BTW, this discussion would make a very valuable 4 page paper for  
OWLED...there will be users and there will be tool builders so we  
could discuss in a better context what sort of advice to give or  
tooling to support.

Cheers,
Bijan.