W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

RE: Names for top and bottom properties

From: Michel_Dumontier <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:38:57 -0400
To: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>, Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, Rees Jonathan <jar@creativecommons.org>, Chris Mungall <cjm@fruitfly.org>
Message-id: <AB349814F1ECB143A5D4CD29C7A645695B368B@CCSEXB10.CUNET.CARLETON.CA>


> I propose we go for the pragmatic solution, and just use the words we  
> (as WG) already use to refer to these properties: topProperty and  
> bottomProperty.

+1

Michel Dumontier

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:41:19 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: Markus Krötzsch: "Re: On adding easy keys and top/bottom to the spec."
In reply to: Michael Smith: "Re: Names for top and bottom properties"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:41:21 GMT