W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Names for top and bottom properties

From: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:52:12 -0400
To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, Rees Jonathan <jar@creativecommons.org>, Chris Mungall <cjm@fruitfly.org>
Message-Id: <1209559932.6597.59.camel@msmith-laptop-wired.int.clarkparsia.com> 

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:17 +0200, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:

> I propose we go for the pragmatic solution, and just use the words we  
> (as WG) already use to refer to these properties: topProperty and  
> bottomProperty.

+1
-- 
Mike Smith

Clark & Parsia
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 12:53:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 April 2008 12:53:03 GMT