Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles

OK - but can you suggest some other names?



On 28 Apr 2008, at 16:48, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On 28 Apr 2008, at 16:33, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>>> If we want to change the names then we should do it *soon* -- the  
>>> existing names are already in wide circulation, and the longer we  
>>> leave it the more difficult and confusing name changes will become.
>>> Ian
>>
>>
>> Is there anything *wrong* with the current names?
>> (e.g. is any name a trade mark, or something that is already  
>> overly aligned with a particularly vendor?
>
> Nope.
>
>> Or offensive in some relevant natural language? etc. etc.)
>> A separate question is are there any better names?
>
> Well, I always hear a post-incremented Evil Laugh when someone  
> types EL++...by that may be an idiosyncratic recation.
>
> DL Lite has the potential for several sorts of confusion (i.e.,  
> with OWL DL, with OWL Lite, etc.)
>
> OWL-R is, afaict, widely loathed.
>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.