Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles

On 28 Apr 2008, at 16:33, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> If we want to change the names then we should do it *soon* -- the  
>> existing names are already in wide circulation, and the longer we  
>> leave it the more difficult and confusing name changes will become.
>> Ian
>
>
> Is there anything *wrong* with the current names?
> (e.g. is any name a trade mark, or something that is already overly  
> aligned with a particularly vendor?

Nope.

> Or offensive in some relevant natural language? etc. etc.)
> A separate question is are there any better names?

Well, I always hear a post-incremented Evil Laugh when someone types  
EL++...by that may be an idiosyncratic recation.

DL Lite has the potential for several sorts of confusion (i.e., with  
OWL DL, with OWL Lite, etc.)

OWL-R is, afaict, widely loathed.

Cheers,
Bijan.