Issue 85 is mainly related to the behaviour of query engines, and so seems to me to be beyond the scope of this WG. Moreover, the extended annotation mechanism of OWL 2 could be used to get some or all of the desired behaviour if used with a suitable query engine. Beyond this, I don't think it is realistic to imagine that we will extend OWL 2 in the direction suggested (i.e., with optional restrictions) -- I'm not sure what the semantics would be and I don't see evidence of support from implementers. I would therefore like to propose closing this issue as postponed, but I wanted to at least offer the chance for people to comment before putting such a proposal before the WG. IanReceived on Monday, 28 April 2008 14:47:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 28 April 2008 14:47:13 GMT