Hi, Forgot to copy the WG. Zhe
attached mail follows:
Alan, Easy keys seems to be very practical. Oracle is likely to implement this feature. Don't take it as a promise though :) Regarding "easiest keys", the counterintuitive case is valid. However, is that a common case? ;) Do we truly expect many users define things like that? Regarding top/bottom role, I am not totally convinced yet. Could someone please describe some practical use cases? Thanks, Zhe Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > Hi Zhe, > > At yesterday's meeting the sentiment of those present was that it was > desirable to move forward with adding easy keys and top/bottom > property. As one a representative of a reasoner implementation, we > need your feedback about whether you concur that these features should > be added to the specification. Could you please carefully review the > easy keys proposal at http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Easy_Keys with > particular attention to the the section "Why not easiest keys?" and > get back to the group with your thoughts on this matter and with an > indication if it is likely that Oracle would implement this feature? > Similarly, the top and bottom property, as described in > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Universal_Property. > > Thanks, > Alan >Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 16:07:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 April 2008 16:07:28 GMT