W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Raised but not yet accepted issues

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:55:23 -0400
Message-Id: <2D61CD89-69B7-4F01-A4EB-72CE30DA03AF@gmail.com>
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>


Issues 110 through 122 are current in status RAISED. Ian and I are  
discussing which of these issues to accept at the moment, so we would  
appreciate if there not be discussion of them on the WG email list  
until we have decided.

Thank you,
Alan

Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 15:03:29 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Schneider: "RE: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions"
Previous message: Alan Ruttenberg: "Re: ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics?"
Next in thread: Michael Schneider: "RE: Raised but not yet accepted issues"
Reply: Michael Schneider: "RE: Raised but not yet accepted issues"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 April 2008 15:03:30 GMT