Alan Wu answered to Ivan Herman: >I think you are right. In OWL Full, the extension of owl:Class should be >the same as the extension of rdfs:Class. Yes (as stated in sec. 5.3 of the old AS&S). OWL R Full can get this by introducing an additional axiomatic triple: owl:Class owl:equivalentClass rdfs:Class So this is covered by ISSUE-116. Cheers, Michael >That table 5 is for OWL-R Full anyway. So I don't worry that it gets out >of DL realm. > >Thanks, > >Zhe > >Ivan Herman wrote: >> Alan, >> >> The first rule in Table 5 of the profile document says >> >> (?c rdf:type owl:Class) => >> (?c rdfs:subClassOf ?c) and >> (?c owl:equivalentClasses ?c) >> >> Isn't it necessary to have the same rule with rdfs:Class instead of >> owl:Class? Of course, that would lead out of the DL realm in the case >> of OWL-R-DL...:-( >> >> Ivan >> > -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 April 2008 09:13:55 GMT