W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Query for import task force

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:30:28 -0400
Message-Id: <DA8884F1-2CCF-4C8B-AC6A-96389BC127ED@gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

There is an implementation in java: http://xml.apache.org/commons/ 
components/resolver/
What I don't know is whether there being a java implementation would  
satisfy all reasoner developers - presumably there are non-java  
reasoners.
-Alan


On Apr 7, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

>
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
>> Subject: Query for import task force
>> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 11:37:28 -0400
>>
>>> About the external mapping file proposal (whether informative or
>>> normative or whatev).
>>>
>>> Is there any reason that we cannot simply encourage implementors to
>>> standardize on XML Catalog?
>>> 	http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/entity/spec-2001-08-06.html
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bijan.
>>
>> It is a bit heavier weight than I think is desirable, even if I was
>> going along with having such a mapping file, which I'm not.
>>
>> peter
>
>
> I also thought it looks heavier than might be desirable, from the  
> point of view getting developer adoption. Perhaps a limited subset  
> of it, or a minimal set of constructs with developers free to  
> implement more?
>
> -Alan
>
>
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 17:36:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 April 2008 17:36:26 GMT