W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: managing the documents as wiki pages

From: Ian Horrocks <Ian.Horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:56:31 +0100
Message-Id: <99B9B262-6D84-4146-90BD-AB483B58693D@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: sandro@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

Nice! - pity we will have change it back into html at the end.

I had the same question as Peter w.r.t. the title and subtitle -- as  
well as the layout not looking right, the section numbers end up  
being a bit strange when you do it this way (everything is 1.x).

Thanks,
Ian



On 26 Oct 2007, at 10:09, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

>
> Looks good.  I like having one page for the document (even though
> MediWiki puts in gratuitous warnings about the page being too big for
> some browsers).
>
> A number of minor issues:
>
> - How are we going to handle the real title?  (Can we have a page with
>   the real title, <br> included, as topic and link there?)  I tried
>   using an <h1>, but this doesn't work very well.
>
> - The OWL WG navigation bar shows up on the left of the document,  
> taking
>   up valuable screen space.  Is there a way to get rid of it?
>
> peter
>
>
>
> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> Subject: managing the documents as wiki pages
> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:53:53 -0400
>
>>
>>
>> I took a pass at converting SSAFSS [1] into a Wiki page:
>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Specification
>>
>> Take a look and let me know how it looks.  (I've run an HTML diff, so
>> I'm fairly confident the text is the same.   The conversation was 90%
>> automatic.)
>>
>> I'm optimistic about just have each document be one Wiki page and  
>> having
>> the conversion for publication be quite trivial.
>>
>>      -- Sandro
>>
>> [1] http://www.webont.org/owl/1.1/owl_specification.html
>>
>
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 09:56:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT