On 24 Oct 2007, at 15:33, Jim Hendler wrote: > I am not opposed to Bijan's amendment, however, I do feel that > waiting and publishing the structural and semantic documents > together would make more sense - Good point. I agree. > the fomalization as a standalone document is likely to send a > message that the group is "academic" (a scare word for some AC's in > W3C) But not for that reason. I think it's most helpful to present a design that has all its major parts. So I hereby withdraw my 3'. 3 is fine. I just didn't think of that when ammending the summary. So, there's seems to be a consensus for pubbing soon the semantics document. But I think that the benefits are relatively minor compared to publishing the core three together. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 17:08:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT