W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Publication proposal discussion summary

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:54:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20071024.105442.122928126.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: hendler@cs.rpi.edu
Cc: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
Subject: Re: Publication proposal discussion summary
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:30:21 -0400

> 
> [snip]
> 
> > * Jim expressed opposition to the structural specification *per se*:
> > 	<http://www.w3.org/mid/F9A27E86-A5E8-4D40-8E77- 
> > FE17CF9F0247@cs.rpi.edu>
> >
> > 	I'm unclear whether this means he objects to its publication for  
> > review.
> 
> I object to its publication for review prior to further WG discussion  
> (for now that is "object" in the sense of don't agree, if pushed it  
> can become "object" in the WG sense, but I hope that won't be  
> necessary given that there seems to be support for the idea of more  
> internal review)

What would cause you to lift this objection?  Suppose, for example, that
no other WG member objected to publication.  Would that suffice to show
that there has been sufficient discussion?

[...]

>    -Jim Hendler

peter
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 15:03:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT