W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Today's teleconference

From: Ian Horrocks <Ian.Horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:26:42 +0100
Message-Id: <75C8B7A3-FC2F-44C9-8295-EDCBA0AB005E@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov

In fact none of the "Relationships" items are intended to be regular  
-- they just look that way because we regularly fail to get to them.  
When we do eventually get to them, the initial goal is to establish  
mechanisms. Subsequently, I would expect that we will only occasional  
agenda items.

Ian


On 23 Oct 2007, at 19:18, ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:

>
> Ian,
>
> My goal in bringing this up was to point out the dependency and  
> potential
> overlap between ODM and OWL revised.  Because of that, it would be  
> good
> to create a formal relationship that can be tapped when (if) we  
> need to
> address these issues in the future.  However, there is no need to  
> create
> a regular item for this in the agenda (as was done in some other  
> groups).
> ODM is not undergoing any major changes anymore and so there would be
> little on which to report (although there are still quite a few open
> issues against the UML -> OWL mapping chapter which will be addressed
> in the coming months).
>
> Of course, if the UML and MOF metamodel in the OWL1.1 submission were
> to disappear en-route to LC then the overlap would also disappear.  In
> any case, I don't see an urgent need to address this tomorrow.
>
> -Evan
>
>
> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> Evan,
>>
>> Relationships with other W3C groups is a charter "expectation", hence
>> the agenda item. I for one would be more than happy to establish
>> relationships with groups outside W3C. I'm not sure that we will have
>> time to discuss this in tomorrow's teleconf, but I will add an item
>> to the agenda in the expectation that it will be postponed but not
>> forgotten.
>>
>> Ian
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 21:26:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT